2024-2025 Global AI Trends Guide
On 1 January 2022, Germany renewed its ever tougher FDI rules yet again. The reform expands definitions of so-called critical infrastructures, especially but not only in the areas of IT services and energy. Indirectly, this results in an expansion of the scope of application of the investment screening for company acquisitions by non-EU/EFTA investors.
The German Ordinance of Critical Infrastructure under the Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (Verordnung zur Bestimmung Kritischer Infrastrukturen nach dem BSI-Gesetz – BSI-KritisV) is the regulation that determines which facilities qualify as critical infrastructure in Germany. Classification as “critical infrastructure” provides for two requirements: Firstly, the infrastructure in question must fall into a certain category of the energy, water, food, IT and telecommunications, health, finance and insurance, or transport and traffic sectors. Secondly, the facilities in question must meet certain thresholds in terms of size and importance. The BSI-KritisV defines both categories and thresholds.
Classification as critical infrastructure not only leads to a number of obligations for operators from an IT security perspective, but also to mandatory filing requirements pursuant to investment control under the Foreign Trade and Payments Act (Außenwirtschaftsgesetz – AWG) and Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (Außenwirtschaftsverordnung – AWV), if the investors are from non-EU/EFTA countries and acquire at least 10% of the shares.
The number of companies falling into the scope of critical infrastructure in Germany is expected to increase by around 15% as a result of the expanded scope of the Ordinance. Regarding critical infrastructure, the scope of investment control will consequently expand to the same extent. In this respect, the reform goes hand in hand with earlier amendments to the AWV, which led to a significant expansion of the German investment control regime.
The changes introduced via the reform affect the following areas in particular:
The reform once again expands the scope of the German FDI regime – albeit this time indirectly. Parties to M&A transactions should keep the reforms and implications for potential transactions in the area in mind if infrastructure that could be considered critical is affected. The reform makes it even clearer that critical infrastructure protection is currently a priority for the EU and its Member States. Further changes can be expected in the future, such as the European Commission's planned legislative proposal for a directive on the resilience of critical facilities.
The new rules come at a time where the German government has only taken office for a few weeks. It hasn’t yet become clear whether the new decision-makers have a different approach to using the FDI regime as a political instrument. There is no indication that the tough scrutiny of foreign investments that we encountered in the last years would be relaxed. Quite the opposite, tensions with China or Russia only seem to make it even more unpredictable which transactions raise concerns from the government’s perspective, and which could require remedies or might even be blocked.
Lasse Heber, a trainee in our Brussels office, contributed to this article.
Authored by Falk Schöning and Stefan Kirwitzke.