Hogan Lovells 2024 Election Impact and Congressional Outlook Report
Celine Jimenez Crowson
Partner Intellectual Property
Celine has also led the patent teams in the most important global technology deals, including one that appeared on the front page of The New York Times. Celine's techno-legal sweet spots include mobile devices and communication technologies, electronic consumer products, mapping and navigation, semi-conductor chip technologies, automotive and smart home technologies, battery technologies, medical and healthcare-related devices, agriculture, and cutting-edge energy technologies.
Celine is also at the forefront of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent challenge practice. She has been involved in numerous Inter Partes Review proceedings, all of which resulted in creating favorable outcomes for her clients. Celine handled the trial for the first ever instituted Post Grant Review proceeding at the USPTO and in 2023 led the IPRs for the most prolific automotive OEM petitioner.
Celine has spent years on the Ronald McDonald House Charities Board and is a current elected member of the Hogan Lovells global board and a member of the Duke Pratt School of Engineering Visitor’s Board. She has also been a guest lecturer at Georgetown Law School's Class in Entrepreneurship.
Lead trial counsel for Mercedes Benz in multiple patent infringement litigations in district courts and the ITC, including a complete victory in Mercedes first ever U.S. patent infringement trial.
Lead trial counsel for Google and LG in WDTX district court litigation resulting in unanimous defense jury verdict of non-infringement and invalidity for all asserted patents.
Lead litigation counsel for electronic consumer companies in numerous patent litigations, including wins in district court and the ITC for products ranging from mobile devices to headsets.
Lead counsel for Covidien/Nellcor in patent infringement action and reexamination brought in connection with client's cerebral oximetry device.
Lead trial counsel for PPG Indus. in patent infringement litigation, resulting in unanimous defense jury verdict of non-infringement and invalidity of all 5 asserted patents.