Financial institutions general regulatory news, 25 January 2021

News

Financial institutions general regulatory news, 25 January 2021

FIG Bulletin

25 January 2021

Recent regulatory developments of interest to all financial institutions. See also our sector specific updates in the Related Materials links.

Financial Services Bill 2019-21

Having completed its progress through the House of Commons, on 14 January 2021, the Financial Services Bill 2019-21 had its first reading in the House of Lords. A revised version of the Bill, together with revised explanatory notes, has been published, reflecting amendments that were made at the report stage of the Bill in the House of Commons.

The most significant amendments relate to new clauses 31 and 32 and new Schedule 12, which concern the application of anti-money laundering legislation to e-money and payment institutions.

The second reading in the House of Lords is scheduled for 28 January 2021.

Separately, the Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) has published a letter (dated 13 January 2021), sent to HM Treasury, relating to areas of legal uncertainty arising from provisions in the Bill. The FMLC's comments relate to regulations about financial collateral arrangements and benchmarks, in particular the FCA powers relating to LIBOR transition and the interaction with measures being taken in other jurisdictions.

Back to the top

Future of UK-EU relations on trade in services: new inquiry launched

The House of Lords EU Services Sub-Committee has launched a new inquiry on the future of UK-EU relations on trade in services. The inquiry will examine the impact of the provisions set out in the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) on the UK’s services sector.

The service sectors of interest to the Committee’s inquiry include, but are not limited to: financial services; professional and business services (such as legal services, accountancy, auditing; architecture, engineering, advertising, market research, recruitment services); creative industries (including audio-visual services); research and education; and data and digital services.

The Committee welcomes submissions from anyone with answers to the call for evidence. It is possible to submit evidence until 5 February 2021.

The Committee seeks evidence on the following questions in particular:â€¯

What is the impact of the UK-EU free trade agreement on trade in services?
What effect may national reservations to the UK-EU TCA have on trade in services with the EU?
What effect will arrangements on the mobility of professionals have on trade in services between the UK and EU?
How will the intellectual property provisions set out in the TCA affect UK-EU trade in services?
How will the arrangements in the TCA shape UK-EU trade in financial services?
The Joint Declaration on Financial Services Regulatory Cooperation sets out that both sides seek to establish structured regulatory cooperation on financial services. What form should this dialogue take?
Given the plans to delegate more powers to financial regulators, what form of Parliamentary oversight of these regulators would be appropriate?
How will the new UK-EU framework for the mutual recognition of professional qualifications affect professionals and service sector businesses?
What will be the impact of the TCA's provisions on the cross-border supply of services and rights of establishment, such as commitments on local presence and economic needs tests?
Under the future relationship agreement, the UK will become an associate member of Horizon Europe but will not associate with the Erasmus+ programme. What impact will this have on the UK’s research and education sector and students?
How will the provisions in the TCA affect the creative industries sector?
The EU has granted the UK a six-month data adequacy "bridge" to allow the free flow of personal data until the EU determines whether to grant a data adequacy decision to the UK. How would the absence of a data adequacy decision at the end of this bridging period affect trade in services?
What impact will the arrangements agreed have on digital trade and trade in digital services between the UK and EU?

Regulatory permissions: FCA reminds firms to use or cancel

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published a statement reminding firms of their obligation to regularly review their regulatory permissions under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) to ensure that they are up to date and removed where they are not needed.

The FCA expects firms to notify it of material changes and apply to make any necessary changes to permissions in a timely way. The FCA reminds firms that it has the power to cancel a firm's Part 4A permission if it has not carried on a regulated activity for at least 12 months.

The FCA notes that firms should be reviewing their permissions and maintaining only those needed to assure firms that they will continue to meet the threshold conditions, are demonstrating effective oversight of their business, meet obligations under the Senior Managers Regime and are providing accurate information to consumers. In addition, it ensures that firms are not paying unnecessary fees for unused permissions. Firms are required to provide the FCA with an annual attestation that the information held on the Financial Services Register is accurate.

The FCA is reminding firms now, as new powers in the Financial Services Bill 2019-21 mean it will be able to act more quickly where it considers firms are no longer carrying out regulated activities. With the new powers, where the FCA believes that a firm is not carrying on a regulated activity, it will be able to serve notice on the firm, asking for a written response within 14 days. If the firm does not respond, the FCA will be able to publish a second, public notice, explaining that it appears the firm is not carrying on a regulated activity. It can then vary or cancel the firm's permissions after one month.

Back to the top

DB pension transfer advice: FCA Assessment Tool and latest data analysis

The FCA has announced that it has launched a Defined Benefit Advice Assessment Tool (DBAAT) which helps the market understand how the FCA assesses the suitability of defined benefit (DB) pension transfer advice.

The DBAAT is used to assess advice given before October 2020. An updated tool that incorporates rule changes that came into force on 1 October 2020 will be published in the coming months, alongside finalised guidance following its June 2020 guidance consultation on advising on pension transfers (GC20/1).

Separately, the FCA has also published its second set of ad hoc data on the DB transfers market, which reveals a significant fall in conversion rates. According to the FCA, this indicates that advice firms are starting to act more in line with its expectations that, in most cases, advice to transfer out of a DB scheme is not in the client’s best interest. The data also showed a significant reduction in insistent clients proceeding to transfer against advice.

The data also shows a reduction in the number of firms offering DB advice (from 3,042 to 1,521 as of January 2021). In some cases, this will be as a result of not having adequate professional indemnity insurance (PII) for DB transfer advice, other firms have given up the permission as they had not used it for an extended period. The FCA emphasises that it expects all firms providing DB transfer advice to have appropriate PII cover in place, in line with FCA rules. If they don’t, they must not carry out DB transfer advice.

The FCA notes that, from April 2021, all firms with the DB transfer permission must report the required data to the FCA on a six-monthly basis.

FCA MoU with DWP and MaPS

The FCA has published a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) it has entered into with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS). The MoU covers arrangements among the parties in carrying out their respective roles and responsibilities under the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018, FSMA and other relevant legislation. The MoU will be reviewed annually and updated in the light of new issues and priorities.

Back to the top

Consumer investments data review 2020: FCA summary

The FCA has published a detailed summary of its work to tackle consumer harm in the investment market between 1 January and 31 October 2020. The FCA states that it is the first publication in a regular, half-yearly series. The FCA considers its work under the following headings:

preventing firms and individuals entering the perimeter;
regulatory oversight of the market;
acting against firms and individuals who cause consumers harm;
stopping scams through behaviour change campaigns;
analysis of consumer complaints and redress paid by firms; and
protecting consumers and improving the mass market.

CMC charges for financial products and services claims: FCA CP21/1

The FCA has published a consultation paper, CP21/1, in which it sets out its proposals to introduce a price cap on the fees claims management companies (CMCs) charge their customers in relation to claims for financial products and services other than payment protection insurance (PPI) claims.

PPI claims are already subject to a cap under the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 (FGCA) of 20% of the redress paid to a customer. Due to the period of change the PPI market is undergoing, the FCA is not proposing to change the PPI cap at this time.

The FCA explains that some customers currently pay fees of more than 40% of the redress they receive. It wants to see consumers who use CMCs charged at a level that reflects the value of the service being provided. The proposed price cap means that CMCs would not be able to charge more than 15% to 30%, depending on how much redress a customer is due. The FCA estimates that the proposed cap could save consumers around £9.6 million a year.

As part of the proposals, CMCs will be required to disclose key information to consumers before they enter into a contract, to help them make better-informed decisions about using CMC services.

The FCA also proposes minor changes to several existing CMC rules, which relate to issues that have arisen since it began regulating the sector in April 2019.

The consultation ends on 21 April 2021 and the FCA expects to publish a policy statement in autumn 2021. It proposes that the new rules would come into force three months from the date they are made, for both new contracts and existing contracts that were entered into before the rules were made, but where charges are imposed after the rules come into force.

FCA Regulation round-up

The FCA has published its Regulation round-up for January 2021 in which it summarises several its publications over the past month. Items of additional interest cover:

competition law compliance: the FCA notes that it recently uncovered evidence that suggested a potential competition law infringement by two trading venues. This related to a suggested/potential joint approach to commercialise market data. The FCA issued formal "on notice" letters to these firms. It reminds all firms to ensure they comply with competition law and of their duty to notify the FCA if they have or believe they may have committed a significant infringement of competition law. It also encourages firms and individuals to use its whistleblowing regime;
the ISDA IBOR Fallbacks Protocol: the FCA notes that ISDA has published its IBOR Fallbacks Protocol for adherence, which comes into effect on 25 January 2021. In light of the announcements made by IBA, LIBOR's administrator, the FCA reminds firms that the Protocol is an important tool in facilitating transition for legacy derivative contracts to alternative rates when LIBOR ceases or is no longer representative. The FCA, Bank of England and Risk Free Rate Working Group strongly support and encourage early adoption of the Protocol among market participants, where appropriate;
a reminder of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) compliance report that private motor insurers and brokers are required to submit annually;
possible harms arising from motor finance broker-dealers issuing "side agreements" to customers and a reminder that such firms must comply with consumer credit legislation and the FCA principles and rules;
livestreaming between 8-10 February 2021 of a series of showcase sessions during which the Digital Sandbox participants will present the solutions they have developed;
concern about lenders relying solely on static FCA Register extract data to decide whether to deal with claims management companies when they should be checking the live status; and
the FCA flags that it has recently updated its webpage on information about Brexit from EEA regulators to include temporary measures for UK firms providing financial services in the EEA, where these exist.

End of Brexit transition period: impact on JMLSG guidance

The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) has signposted areas within the JMLSG anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) guidance that are impacted by the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020. The following provisions are no longer appropriate and will be amended in due course:

the definition of a "third country" has become a country other than the UK, as opposed to outside the EEA. EEA entities are therefore third country entities for the purposes of AML;
Part III Section 1: the same level of information is to be provided by UK Payment Service Providers (PSPs), regardless of whether funds are being transferred to/from EEA countries or any other third country. UK PSPs should consider relevant legislative changes, including The Money Laundering and Transfer of Funds (Information) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, when ensuring that complete Payer and Payee information accompanies all outbound wire transfers and when detecting non-compliant incoming wire transfers;
specific references to observing European Supervisory Authority (ESA) guidelines within the Guidance are no longer appropriate; and
regarding correspondent relationships involving the execution of payments, firms should take cognisance of the effectiveness of the AML/CTF regime of any third country when determining the extent of the EDD measures to apply to respondents in that country.

Back to the top

UK Regulators Network: second publication of performance scorecards

The UK Regulators Network (UKRN), which includes the FCA, has published a document Moving Forward Together - Scorecards II, as part of the performance scorecards initiative, which provides insight into how effectively companies in water, energy, telecoms and essential financial services are delivering for their consumers.

Following the publication of a first set of performance scorecards in January 2020, the UKRN, with the FCA, Ofcom, Ofgem, Ofwat and Consumer Council for Water (CCW), have continued to work together to further develop a set of performance scorecards to measure the customer experience including on service quality/ satisfaction and value for money. These performance scorecards are intended to help regulators and regulated companies determine where to focus action, increase the incentives for suppliers to improve performance and to provide regulators and policymakers with indicators that will help identify and address any common challenges across sectors. In addition, the information provided in the scorecards may also help consumers to make informed decisions when choosing a service provider.

EU economic and financial system: European Commission Communication on further steps to foster openness, strength and resilience

The European Commission has published a Communication proposing a new strategy to foster the openness, strength and resilience of Europe's economic and financial system, together with FAQs and a factsheet on "What is the capital markets union?". The Communication is addressed to the European Parliament, the Council of the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and the Committee of the Regions (CoR).

The Commission recognises that the global economy is increasingly multipolar, and the short-term pursuit of unilateral interests by specific actors can undermine effective multilateral cooperation. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to strengthen the EU's economic and financial system. The pandemic has boosted the EU's resolve to work with partners for a truly global recovery.

In this context, the Commission considers that the EU has a vital role in shaping the system of global economic governance and developing mutually beneficial bilateral relations, while protecting itself from unfair and abusive practices. The Communication sets out a new strategy for the EU, outlining how the Commission intends to achieve this goal. This goes together with the EU's commitment to a more resilient and open global economy, well-functioning international financial markets and the rules-based multilateral system.

The proposed approach outlined in the Communication is based on three mutually reinforcing pillars:

a stronger international role of the euro, which includes supporting the development of euro denominated instruments and benchmarks and fostering its status as an international reference currency in the energy and commodities sectors.
further developed and more resilient EU financial market infrastructures, including to any extra-territorial application of sanctions to third countries; and
further enhanced uniform implementation and enforcement of the EU's own sanctions.

The Commission explains that its actions under the pillars will be taken against the backdrop of its continued work on completing the Banking Union and building a Capital Markets Union, which will strengthen the EU economically and financially.

The Commission will monitor the actions outlined in the Communication on an ongoing basis. It will review the state of implementation in 2023.

Back to the top

IFD: EBA final reports on draft RTS on risk takers and variable remuneration

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the following final reports on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) under Articles 30(4) and 32(8) of the Investment Firms Directive (IFD):

final report on draft RTS on the classes of instruments that adequately reflect the credit quality of an investment firm as a going concern and possible alternative arrangements that are appropriate to be used for the purposes of variable remuneration. These draft RTS introduce requirements for investment firms regarding Additional Tier 1, Tier 2 and other instruments used for the purposes of variable remuneration, to ensure that they appropriately reflect the credit quality of the investment firm and to specify possible alternative arrangements for the pay-out of variable remuneration where investment firms do not issue any of the instruments referred to in Article 32 of the IFD. The provisions in these draft RTS are aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation 527/2014 on classes of instruments that are appropriate to be used for the purposes of variable remuneration under the Capital Requirements Directive. This is to ensure that groups of credit institutions and investment firms can use a common set of instruments for remuneration purposes; and
final report on draft RTS on criteria to identify categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on an investment firm's risk profile or assets it manages ("risk takers"). Risk takers will be identified based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative criteria specified in the RTS. To ensure that all risk takers are identified, members of staff are identified as having a material impact on the institution's risk profile as soon as they meet at least one of the qualitative or quantitative criteria in the RTS or (where necessary because of the specificities of their business model) additional internal criteria. Following the feedback received during the consultation, the qualitative criteria have been revised to enhance the application of proportionality. The final draft RTS also clarify how the criteria should be applied on a consolidated and individual basis.

The final reports have been submitted to the European Commission.

FICOD: Joint Committee of ESAs final report on draft ITS on reporting of intragroup transactions and risk concentration

The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) has published a final report on draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on the reporting of intragroup transactions and risk concentration under the Financial Conglomerates Directive (FICOD). It has published separately the proposed annexes to the ITS.

Articles 7 and 8 of FICOD require financial conglomerates to monitor intra-group transactions and risk concentrations and to report to coordinator supervisors, at least annually, all significant intra-group transactions and any significant risk concentration at the conglomerate level. Articles 21a(2b) and (2c) of FICOD give the ESAs the power to develop ITS on the reports made under Articles 7 and 8. They are intended to supplement the regulatory technical standards (RTS) on risk concentration and intra-group transactions set out in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2303.

The Joint Committee intends for the ITS to apply from 1 January 2022.

Back to the top

SFDR: Joint Committee of ESAs seeks clarification

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a letter from Steven Maijoor, Chair of the Joint Committee of the ESAs, to John Berrigan, Director General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union at the European Commission, on priority issues relating to the application of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). In the letter, Mr Maijoor explains that the ESAs have encountered several important areas of uncertainty in the interpretation of the SFDR as part of the consultation process relating to draft RTS under it. Mr Maijoor states that the following areas (summarised in more detail in the Annex to the letter) would benefit from urgent clarification to facilitate the orderly application of the SFDR from 10 March 2021:

the application of the SFDR to non-EU alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) and registered AIFMs;
the application of the 500-employee threshold for principal adverse impact reporting on parent undertakings of a large group;
the meaning of "promotion" in the context of products promoting environmental or social characteristics;
the application of Article 9 of the SFDR (transparency of sustainable investments in pre-contractual disclosures); and
the application of SFDR product rules to portfolios and dedicated funds.

CRD: EBA consults on guidelines on monitoring threshold for establishing intermediate EU parent undertaking

The EBA has published a consultation paper on guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects for establishing an intermediate EU parent undertaking (IPU) under Article 21b of the CRD.

Article 21b of the CRD introduced a requirement for institutions belonging to third-country groups to have an IPU established in the EU where the total value of assets in the EU of the third-country group is equal to or greater than EUR 40 billion. The proposed guidelines specify the methodology to calculate the total value of assets in the EU of the third-country groups and clarify how to monitor this value in order to meet the IPU requirement. The guidelines specify that the total value of assets in the EU of the third-country group should be calculated as an average over the last four quarters. This value should be monitored on a quarterly basis and communicated to relevant competent authorities.

In order to meet the IPU requirement in a timely manner it is necessary that institutions belonging to third-country groups apply a forward-looking approach. The guidelines therefore specify that they should assess at least annually whether the threshold is expected to be breached within the three-year horizon, based on the strategic planning of the third-country group and the projections of assets. For the purpose of both the quarterly assessments and the annual forward-looking monitoring, institutions and branches belonging to a third-country group should exchange between each other all necessary information.

In addition, the guidelines specify certain procedural aspects relating to the monitoring of the threshold by competent authorities and the establishment of the IPU where necessary.

The consultation closes on 15 March 2021.

Back to the top

FSB 2021 work programme

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published its work programme for 2021, together with an indicative timeline of FSB publications planned for 2021 (annexed). The work programme reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment. The FSB will reinforce its forward-looking monitoring of developments to identify, assess and address new and emerging risks to global financial stability, and continue to assess the functioning of the regulatory framework put in place after the 2008 global financial crisis. Significant areas of the FSB's work during 2021 include:

non-bank financial intermediation;
central counterparty resilience, recovery and resolvability;
cross-border payments;
climate change and sustainable finance;
interest rate benchmarks; and
cyber and operational resilience.

In addition, the FSB will continue to promote financial stability during market stress related to COVID-19.

BIS Innovation Hub 2021 annual work programme

The Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) Innovation Hub has set out its annual work programme for 2021, focussing on six key areas as it fosters international collaboration among central banks on innovative financial technology. The thematic priorities are:

SupTech and RegTech;
next-generation financial market infrastructures;
central bank digital currencies;
open finance;
cyber security; and
green finance.

These priorities will be supported by the BIS Innovation Network, a network of experts drawn from BIS's 63 member central banks, which was launched on 19 January 2021.

Back to the top