Hogan Lovells 2024 Election Impact and Congressional Outlook Report
15 November 2024
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is seeking comments on recommendations to update the List of Bioengineered Foods (List) under the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (NBFDS) [1]. AMS seeks comment on four issues: (1) whether it should add insect-resistant sugarcane to the List; (2) whether it should add the modifier "virus-resistant" to summer squash, which already is on the List; (3) whether additional information is available to support adding cowpea or golden rice to the List; and (4) whether AMS should consider adding any other foods to the List. Comments are due to AMS by August 24, 2020.
On July 29, 2016, Congress established the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Act, creating a national standard for disclosing that a food is or may be bioengineered. In its regulations implementing the new law, AMS established at 7 C.F.R. § 66.6 the List of Bioengineered Foods, and said the agency plans to update the List annually. Presently, the List includes: alfalfa, apple (Arctic™ varieties), canola, corn, cotton, eggplant (BARI Bt Begun varieties), papaya (ringspot virus resistant varieties), pineapple (pink flesh varieties), potato, salmon (AquAdvantage®), soybean, squash (summer), and sugarbeet.
If a regulated entity uses a food or ingredient produced from an item on the List, it must make a bioengineered food disclosure unless it has records demonstrating the food or ingredient it is using is not bioengineered. In addition to the foods on the List, a disclosure is required when a regulated entity has actual knowledge that a food or an ingredient is bioengineered.
When AMS considers adding foods to the List, it will assess two criteria: (1) whether the food been authorized for commercial production somewhere in the world, and (2) whether the food currently is in legal commercial production for human food somewhere in the world. Once a food is added to the List, regulated entities would have 18 months following the effective date of the updated List to revise food labels to reflect changes to the List.
AMS is seeking request for comment on four issues:
4. Other foods for AMS consideration: AMS also seeks comment on any other foods other than those identified above that it should consider for addition to the List.
Regulated entities are encouraged to submit comments, particularly on the extent to which the insect-resistant sugarcane is currently identified as such in supply chain records, and on the compliance date for any changes to the List. For example, to the extent changes to the List are finalized in January 2021 with a concurrent effective date, the compliance date for such changes would be July 2022, just six months after the initial January 1, 2022 compliance date.
We will continue to monitor AMS’s implementation of the NBFDS. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Authored by Martin Hahn, Veronica Colas and Leigh Barcham